☏ +1-323-254-5961  |  ✉ sales@greensofttech.com

  • Services
    • Chemical Regulations
      • California Proposition 65
      • EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR)
      • EU REACH
      • EU RoHS
      • Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS)
      • Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
      • PFAS Regulations
      • SCIP Database
      • U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
      • Anti-Slavery and Human Trafficking
      • Conflict Minerals (CMRT & EMRT)
      • Smelter or Refiner (SOR) Validation
    • Other Services
      • eCMA Forms for Boston Scientific Suppliers
      • Full Material Declaration (FMD)
      • Material Declaration and SDoC Collection
  • Software
    • All Software
      • On-Premise GreenData Manager Software
      • Cloud-Based Hosted GreenData Manager Software
      • PLM/ERP Integration
    • GDM Add-on Modules
      • Component Disclosure Module
      • Conflict Minerals Module
      • EMRT Module
      • Escalation Manager Module
      • iGDM Component Database Search
      • SCIP Module
  • Resources
    • All Resources
      • Data Sheets
      • EU RoHS & UK RoHS Combined Exemptions List
      • Events and Webinars
        • 📌 Environmental Compliance Made Simple: A Practical Guide for Electronics Manufacturers
      • IPC-1752A Viewer Tool
      • PFAS Resource Center
      • SCIP Database FAQ
      • Webinars and Videos Archive
      • White Paper Library
  • Company
    • About GreenSoft
      • Careers
      • Customers
      • Case Studies
      • Security
  • Blog
  • Contact

PFAS

May 23, 2022 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

PFAS Restrictions Facing Electronics Producers

PFASManufacturers face various proposals restricting PFAS “Forever Chemicals” in the US and EU

Concern over the dangers of Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or “PFAS,” have increased exponentially in recent years.

These substances, often called “forever chemicals,” have become a popular topic in the media. And government bodies around the globe are racing to implement PFAS restrictions.

However, the nature of PFAS substances makes regulating the chemicals a complicated task, and will make the effort to comply with such regulations difficult for manufacturers.

GreenSoft Technology has published a series of educational videos on YouTube addressing the concerns and current status of PFAS restrictions around the globe. View the full paylist online.

What are PFAS "Forever Chemicals"? Where can you find a list of PFAS substances?

The term “PFAS” refers to a class of chemicals rather than a specific chemical or mixture. This makes PFAS difficult to define specifically, but the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has identified the primary distinguisher for PFAS as “a fluorinated substance that contains at least one fully fluorinated methyl or methylene carbon atom."

The nature of PFAS also makes it difficult to compile a list of PFAS substances. The OECD has identified and listed over 4,700 PFAS chemicals, while the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified and listed over 12,000 PFAS chemicals.

PFAS substances are referred to as “forever chemicals” because they break down very slowly and accumulate in the environment and in human tissue, specifically the liver. PFAS has been detected in drinking water, food supplies, and even in newborn babies.

View or share the “What are PFAS ‘Forever Chemicals?’” video here.

PFAS restrictions facing electronics manufacturers

While currently there are no active PFAS restrictions directed at electronics producers, there are various regulatory approaches in development around the globe that could affect electronics producers in the future.

Until now, most legislative activity related to PFAS has been focused on drinking water PFAS limits and the removal of PFAS from firefighting foams. Newer restrictions have also been directed at food contact products and cosmetics.

But research and analysis of potential PFAS restrictions are ongoing globally, including in the EU, in US at the federal level, and in the US at the state level. Notably, there is a new proposal in the EU to place restrictions on all PFAS substances entirely (excluding essential uses).

The proposals have taken various approaches. Some aim to restrict a single substance (i.e.  PFOS), others aim to restrict a group of PFAS substances (i.e. non-polymeric PFAS), and others aim to restrict all PFAS as a substance group (with exceptions for essential use).

View or share the PFAS Restrictions Facing Electronics Manufacturers video here.

PFAS restrictions in the European Union

There are multiple existing restrictions on PFAS in the EU stemming from various regulations. The PFAS substances restricted or pending restriction under EU REACH, EU POPs, or the Stockholm Convention include: PFOS, PFHxS, PFOA, C9-C14 PFCAs, PFHxA, HFOP-DA (Gen X), and PFBS.

Additionally, more restrictions are being proposed or reviewed:

  • Some PFAS are currently undergoing REACH substance evaluation or have a harmonized classification under the CLP regulation.
  • A dossier was submitted to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in January 2022 to ban the use of PFAS in firefighting foams.
  • 5 EU member states (Netherlands, Denmark, Germany, Norway, and Sweden) have proposed a broad ban on all PFAS usage excluding “essential uses” (which have yet to be defined). A final dossier is expected to be submitted in July 2023.
  • A proposed restriction on PFHxA by Germany is now moving forward.

View or share the PFAS Restrictions in the European Union video here.

PFAS restrictions in the United States

Currently, there are no specific PFAS restrictions or regulations at the federal level in the US. However, the EPA has issued a “PFAS Strategic Roadmap” to outline the actions that it will take to address the risks of PFAS usage, including:

  • Publish a national PFAS testing strategy. (Released October 2021)
  • Ensure a robust review process for new PFAS. (Efforts ongoing)
  • Review existing PFAS under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). (Expected Summer 2022 and ongoing)
  • Enhance PFAS reporting under the Toxics Release Inventory. (Expected Spring 2022)
  • Finalize new PFAS reporting under TSCA Section 8. (Expected Winter 2022)

At the state level, 20 US states have enacted PFAS drinking water standards as of March 1, 2022, and 6 states have pending PFAS drinking water standards. The water standards are not universal, so each state’s restrictions have different chemical and threshold limits.

As of this time, there are no specific regulations directed at consumer or electronic products. However, California and Washington have introduced legislation to ban PFAS in cosmetics, with six other states looking to follow. And California has added or is considering adding the following PFAS chemicals to the California Proposition 65 substances list: PFOS, PFOA, PFDA, PFHxS, PFNA, and PFUnDA.

View or share the PFAS Restrictions in the United Sates video here.

Summary

While electronics producers are not yet directly targeted by regulations on PFAS substances, future restrictions seem likely if the current trend continues.

Compliance with such regulations will be complicated due to the difficult to define nature of PFAS chemicals, and the varying and inconsistent approaches from government bodies.

GreenSoft Technology has already begun to help our customers compile their own lists of PFAS chemicals to track in their products as part of our Data Services.

We will keep a close eye on PFAS regulatory developments around the globe, and will post updates to our blog. Be sure to subscribe to our blog to receive updates in your email inbox.

Subscribe to our Blog

Blog Search & Categories

Categories
  • Anti-Slavery and Human Trafficking
  • CA Prop 65 PFAS
  • California Proposition 65
  • Canada PFAS
  • Canadian Environmental Protection Act
  • CE Mark
  • Certificate of Compliance
  • China RoHS
  • Component Disclosure Module
  • Conflict Minerals & Extended Minerals
  • eCMA Forms
  • EN 50581/EN IEC 63000:2018
  • EU Battery Directive
  • EU Green Deal
  • EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR)
  • EU Packaging Regulation
  • EU Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Regulation
  • EU PFAS
  • EU REACH
  • EU RoHS
  • EU Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)
  • Events
  • French Environmental Labeling Requirements
  • Full Material Declaration (FMD)
  • GreenData Manager Software
  • GreenSoft Data Services
  • GreenSoft Technology
  • Hosted GreenData Manager (GDM) Software
  • IEC 62474
  • iGDM Component Database Search
  • IPC-1752A
  • IPC-1752A Viewer
  • JGPSSI & JIG-101
  • Korea REACH
  • Maine PFAS
  • Maritime
  • Market Access
  • Minnesota PFAS
  • New Mexico PFAS
  • PFAS
  • SCIP Database
  • Seminars
  • Trade Shows
  • TSCA PFAS
  • U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
  • UK RoHS
  • Uncategorized
  • Webinars
  • White Paper Library

Related Posts

Plan to Implement Exemptions, Modifications to Scope of TSCA 8(A)(7) PFAS Rule Confirmed

EPA plans to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in December 2025

EU PFAS Ban Update: ECHA Takes Next Step in Restricting PFAS under EU REACH

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has published an updated proposal to restrict PFAS under the EU REACH regulation.

Minnesota PFAS Reporting Deadline Extended Six Months

Deadline for reporting PFAS under Minnesota’s new regulation pushed to July 1, 2026

Australia Bans PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS Under New PFAS Regulation

New PFAS Ban in Australia Effective July 1, 2025

PFAS Reporting Period Under U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Delayed Until 2026

The EPA has announced the delay of the PFAS reporting period under U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) from July 2025 to April 2026.

Company

About 
Blog
Contact

Services

Data Services 
Software
Resources
Support

Subscribe to our Blog

© 2025 GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

    Previous Post

  • New Conflict Minerals Reporting Template Version Released

    Next Post

  • California Proposition 65: Warning Label Changes to Undergo New Proposal