California Proposition 65
June 23, 2020 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.
Lawsuit Filed Against Best Buy for Exposure to Plastic on GoPro Devices
Consumer advocacy group files suit against Best Buy for exposure to plastic suction cup mounts for GoPro devices
Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. filed the suit on June 4, accusing Best Buy of failing to warn consumers about the presence of a toxic chemical, Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (“DEHP”), in plastic suction cup camera mounts for GoPro devices.
California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65) requires businesses to inform Californians about exposures to chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
Failure to inform the public prior to exposure is prosecutable by the California Attorney General’s Office, by district or city attorneys, and by “any individual acting in the public interest” such as the plaintiff in this suit.
Penalties for being found in violation of California Proposition 65 can be as high as $2,500 per violation (per exposed person), per day.
As this lawsuit shows, it is not just manufacturers that can be prosecuted under California Proposition 65, but also retailers and other businesses. Additionally, the toxic chemical exposure in this case comes not from an electronic product, but from an electronic accessory.
This lawsuit serves as a warning for other companies to ensure they are performing adequate supply chain due diligence to obtain information from suppliers on the risk of products before exposing the public to those products.
GreenSoft Collects Chemical Information for CA Prop 65 Compliance for You
As part of our California Proposition 65 Data Services, we will collect substance data from your suppliers on your behalf, and check it against the list of chemicals regulated under CA Prop 65 using our powerful, purpose-built GreenData Manager compliance software.
This will provide you with the data you need to show compliance with California Proposition 65 while freeing up your time to focus on your original business goals of making and selling products instead of complying with detailed regulations. Contact us to learn more.
Subscribe to our Blog
Blog Search & Categories
- Anti-Slavery and Human Trafficking
- California Proposition 65
- Canadian Environmental Protection Act
- CE Mark
- Certificate of Compliance
- China RoHS
- Component Disclosure Module
- Conflict Minerals – Canada
- Conflict Minerals – EU
- Conflict Minerals – U.S.
- eCMA Forms
- EN 50581/EN IEC 63000:2018
- EU Battery Directive
- EU Green Deal
- EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR)
- EU Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Regulation
- EU REACH
- EU RoHS
- EU Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)
- French Environmental Labeling Requirements
- Full Material Declaration (FMD)
- GreenData Manager Software
- GreenSoft Data Services
- GreenSoft Technology
- Hosted GreenData Manager (GDM) Software
- iGDM Component Database Search
- IPC-1752A Viewer
- JGPSSI & JIG-101
- Korea REACH
- SCIP Database
- Trade Shows
- U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
- UK RoHS
- White Paper Library
Private CA Prop 65 enforcers increasingly targeting PFAS for enforcement actions
Rulemaking timeframe lapses for CA Prop 65 proposed changes to warning labels; new proposal process to begin soon
New Substances Added to California Prop 65 List
California Proposition 65 Short-Form Warning Label Proposal Sees Additional Changes
Access & View New California Prop 65 Webinar Today!