☏ +1-323-254-5961  |  ✉ sales@greensofttech.com

  • Services
    • Chemical Regulations
      • California Proposition 65
      • EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR)
      • EU REACH
      • EU RoHS
      • Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS)
      • Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
      • PFAS Regulations
      • SCIP Database
      • U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
      • Anti-Slavery and Human Trafficking
      • Conflict Minerals (CMRT & EMRT)
      • Smelter or Refiner (SOR) Validation
    • Other Services
      • eCMA Forms for Boston Scientific Suppliers
      • Full Material Declaration (FMD)
      • Material Declaration and SDoC Collection
  • Software
    • All Software
      • On-Premise GreenData Manager Software
      • Cloud-Based Hosted GreenData Manager Software
      • PLM/ERP Integration
    • GDM Add-on Modules
      • Component Disclosure Module
      • Conflict Minerals Module
      • EMRT Module
      • Escalation Manager Module
      • iGDM Component Database Search
      • SCIP Module
  • Resources
        • ✅ BOM Scrub Tool - Estimate Your Project Timeline Online
        • Data Sheets
        • EU RoHS & UK RoHS Combined Exemptions List
        • Events and Webinars
          • 📌 WEBINAR: Environmental Compliance Made Simple - Register Now!
          • 📌 WEBINAR: Building Your Environmental Compliance Plan - Register Now!
        • IPC-1752A Viewer Tool
        • PFAS Resource Center
        • SCIP Database FAQ
        • Webinars and Videos Archive
        • White Paper Library
  • Company
    • About GreenSoft
    • Careers
    • Case Studies
    • Customers
    • Security
  • Blog
  • Contact

New Mexico PFAS

April 16, 2025 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

New Mexico Passes New PFAS Regulation

New Mexico PFAS Regulation

PFAS notification requirements go into effect January 2026; PFAS ban goes into effect January 2032

On April 8, the Governor of New Mexico signed the new “Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances Protection Act” (HB 212) regulation.

This legislation authorizes the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board (EIB) to adopt rules prohibiting certain products that contain intentionally-added PFAS.

Effective January 1, 2032, no manufacturer may sell, offer for sale or distribute for sale, directly or indirectly or through intermediaries, any product that contains intentionally added PFAS in the state of New Mexico, unless the EIB has adopted a rule providing a Currently Unavoidable Use (CUU) for that product.

Additionally, some products have bans that take effect before the general prohibition in 2032. Per Section 3B of HB 212, effective January 1, 2027, a manufacturer shall not sell in the state the following products that contains intentionally added PFAS​:

  • Cookware​
  • Food Packaging​
  • Dental Floss​
  • Juvenile Products, such as children’s car seats, clothing and toys.​
    • Juvenile products does NOT include electronic products such as personal computers, audio/video equipment, calculators, wireless phones, gaming consoles, handheld devices with video screen, or associated peripheral devices (such as mouse, keyboard, power supply or power cords). ​
  • Firefighting Foam

And per Section 3C of the regulation, effective January 1, 2028, a manufacturer shall not sell in the state the following products that contain intentionally added PFAS:

  • Carpets/Rugs​
  • Cleaning Supplies​
  • Cosmetics​
  • Fabric Treatments​
  • Feminine Hygiene Products​
  • Textiles/Textile Furnishings​
  • Ski Wax​
  • Upholstered Furniture

Read the full text of the regulation and track the regulation status here.


Currently unavoidable use (“CUU”), similarities to other states, and the effects on electronic equipment

The New Mexico regulation defines PFAS as a “per- or poly- fluoroalkyl substance in a class of fluorinated organic chemicals containing at least one fully fluorinated carbon atom.” This is the same definition used in the PFAS regulation in the states of Maine and Minnesota.

The regulation defines "Currently unavoidable use" as a use of PFAS that the EIB has determined by rule to be essential for health, safety or the functioning of society and for which alternatives are not reasonably available.​ This is also same definition as in Maine and Minnesota.

Per Section 3A of the regulation, certain product categories are exempt from the regulation:

  • Product for which federal law governs the presence of PFAS​
  • Used Product for sale or resale​
  • Medical Devices regulated by the USDA​
  • Cooling, Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning or Refrigeration Equipment.​
  • Veterinary Products and its Packaging​
  • Product development for the purposed of public health, environmental or water quality test.​
  • Motor Vehicle or Motor Vehicle equipment​
  • Watercraft and Aircraft
  • Semiconductor and the equipment and materials used in the manufacture of semiconductors.​
  • Non-Consumer electronics and non-consumer laboratory equipment not intended for personal, family or household purposes.​
  • Products that contains intentionally added PFAS with uses that are currently listed as acceptable  by the US EPA.​
  • Product used for the generation, distribution or storage of electricity.​
  • Equipment directly used in the manufacture or development of the products listed above​
  • Product for which the EIB has adopted a rule providing a CUU.​
  • Product that contains fluoropolymers consisting of polymeric substance for which the backbone of the polymer is a PFAS. 

Due to electronics-related exemptions only being provided for semiconductors, non-consumer electronics, and non-consumer laboratory equipment, this new regulation directly impacts producers of electronic or electrical devices intended for use in consumer applications.

Moreover, the EIB shall adopt rules on the reporting requirements to the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) to be placed on the manufacturer.  Also, the EIB may create a series of ranges on the amount of PFAS for reporting purposes and the labeling of products in both English and Spanish.  Lastly, there could be testing requirements if NMED has reason to believe that a product containing intentionally added PFAS is being sold.


Avoid potential penalties with GreenSoft Technology’s a PFAS compliance solution for manufacturers

A manufacturer found in violation of New Mexico’s new PFAS regulation may face civil penalties of up to $15,000, along with additional fines for each day the violation occurred. Additionally, manufacturers that continue to fail to comply may be subjected to civil penalties of up to $25,000 for every day of continued noncompliance.

To avoid these significant penalties and ensure compliance with New Mexico's PFAS regulation, affected companies can leverage GreenSoft Technology's PFAS Data Services solution.

GreenSoft Technology’s PFAS Data Services solution provides companies with the chemical data from their supply chain needed to comply with PFAS regulations – including New Mexico’s, Minnesota’s, and others across the globe.

Our data collection team will contact your suppliers to obtain data on the PFAS chemicals and other substances contained in your product and components. We’ll validate that data and check it for accuracy and completeness. With our Turnkey Service, we can generate the necessary compliance reports for you. Or you can use our GreenData Manager software to manage your company’s substance database and easily generate reports for this and other environmental regulations.

Contact us to learn more.

Subscribe to our Blog

Blog Search & Categories

Categories
  • Anti-Slavery and Human Trafficking
  • CA Prop 65 PFAS
  • California Proposition 65
  • Canada PFAS
  • Canadian Environmental Protection Act
  • CE Mark
  • Certificate of Compliance
  • China RoHS
  • Component Disclosure Module
  • Conflict Minerals & Extended Minerals
  • eCMA Forms
  • EN 50581/EN IEC 63000:2018
  • EU Battery Directive
  • EU Green Deal
  • EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR)
  • EU Packaging Regulation
  • EU Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Regulation
  • EU PFAS
  • EU REACH
  • EU RoHS
  • EU Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)
  • Events
  • French Environmental Labeling Requirements
  • Full Material Declaration (FMD)
  • GreenData Manager Software
  • GreenSoft Data Services
  • GreenSoft Technology
  • Hosted GreenData Manager (GDM) Software
  • IEC 62474
  • iGDM Component Database Search
  • IPC-1752A
  • IPC-1752A Viewer
  • JGPSSI & JIG-101
  • Korea REACH
  • Maine PFAS
  • Maritime
  • Market Access
  • Minnesota PFAS
  • New Mexico PFAS
  • PFAS
  • SCIP Database
  • Seminars
  • Trade Shows
  • TSCA PFAS
  • U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
  • UK RoHS
  • Uncategorized
  • Webinars
  • White Paper Library

Related Posts

Plan to Implement Exemptions, Modifications to Scope of TSCA 8(A)(7) PFAS Rule Confirmed

EPA plans to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in December 2025

EU PFAS Ban Update: ECHA Takes Next Step in Restricting PFAS under EU REACH

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has published an updated proposal to restrict PFAS under the EU REACH regulation.

Minnesota PFAS Reporting Deadline Extended Six Months

Deadline for reporting PFAS under Minnesota’s new regulation pushed to July 1, 2026

Australia Bans PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS Under New PFAS Regulation

New PFAS Ban in Australia Effective July 1, 2025

PFAS Reporting Period Under U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Delayed Until 2026

The EPA has announced the delay of the PFAS reporting period under U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) from July 2025 to April 2026.

Company

About 
Blog
Contact

Services

Data Services 
Software
Resources
Support

Subscribe to our Blog

© 2025 GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

    Previous Post

  • New Study Reveals Impact of Prop 65: Product Reformulation and Increased Supply Chain Transparency 

    Next Post

  • New Conflict Minerals Reporting Template, Extended Minerals Reporting Template Released